Tatami re-covering and replacement at move-out: do you pay?

At move-out you may be charged for re-covering or replacing tatami. Under Japan's restoration guideline, sun fading and aging are the landlord's burden, while stains and burns you caused are yours.

更新: 2026-06-13

At move-out, settlement statements often list charges for re-covering tatami (omote-gae) or replacing whole mats. Under Japan's restoration guideline (MLIT, "Guideline on Restoration Trouble"), these are not always the tenant's burden.

Aging and sun fading: the landlord's burden

The tatami surface ("tatami-omote") is treated as a consumable, so no depreciation calculation by years applies to it. Natural fading from sunlight and ordinary aging count as "normal wear and aging," which the landlord bears — you should not be charged for them.

When the tenant pays

If you caused the damage through negligence — spilled stains left to set, scorch holes from cigarettes or an iron, deep gouges — that can be the tenant's burden. The base layer beneath the mat ("tatami-doko") has a useful life of 6 years, so even where it must be replaced, longer tenancy reduces your share.

Use the checker below to estimate which side your case falls on.

退去精算チェッカー(無料)

退去時の請求が「払うべきもの」か「払わなくていいもの」か。国交省ガイドラインに照らして目安を出します。

払わなくていい可能性が高い

これは通常の使用や経年劣化にあたる項目です。ガイドライン上は原則として大家さん(貸主)の負担とされ、あなたが払う必要は基本的にありません。

根拠: 経年劣化・自然現象による変色は貸主負担。

ガイドラインに基づく目安です。実際の負担は契約内容により変わります。判断に迷ったら専門家にご相談ください。

実際の契約書と精算書で、全項目をまとめてAI診断。

PDF 2点をアップロードして分析する →

其他情況